Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16953249›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2006

Gene therapy progress and prospects: non-viral gene therapy by systemic delivery.

S-D Li, L Huang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Granular Hydrogels for Harnessing the Immune Response.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Nucleic Acid Delivery from Granular Hydrogels.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S-D LiDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7360, USA.
L Huang

Funding

INFLAMMATORY TOXICITY IN NON-VIRAL GENE THERAPYR01AI048851 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HUANG, LEAF · 2001 to 2005
$1.1M
Advance Drug Delivery for Bladder DysfunctionR01DK068556 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUANG, LEAF · 2004 to 2007
$1.0M
Safe and Efficacious Non-viral Vectors for Gene TherapyR56AI048851 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUANG, LEAF · 2007 to 2007
$329k
NIAID NIH HHS AI48851NIDDK NIH HHS DK68556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-viral vectors continue to be an attractive alternative to viral vectors due to their safety, versatility and ease of preparation and scale-up. Over the past few years, investigators have been successful in developing gene carriers that can be targeted to the disease site. Several different delivery vectors for systemic use have been developed by different groups for plasmid DNA and oligonucleotide. Most of them are designed for targeted tumor therapy. The mechanism of inflammatory toxicity, the major toxicity of cationic lipoplex, has been studied and managed. In this review, we focus on the progress made over the last 2 years. We also discuss some future prospects for gene delivery.

Indexed as

DNAForecastingGene TargetingGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansInjectionsLiposomesNeoplasmsRNA InterferenceTransfectionDNALiposomes

Identifiers

PMID16953249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.