Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16951087›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

Evolution of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope gene is dominated by purifying selection.

C T T Edwards, E C Holmes, O G Pybus, D J Wilson, R P Viscidi, E J Abrams, R E Phillips, A J Drummond

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Purifying Selection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1Journal of clinical medicine research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Insights into the Impact of CD8Journal of virology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic Analysis of Viral Outbreaks.Annual review of virology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C T T EdwardsNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, UK, and Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. cedwards@maths.uct.ac.za
E C Holmes
O G Pybus
D J Wilson
R P Viscidi
E J Abrams
R E Phillips
A J Drummond
University of Oxford · GBNuffield Health · GBColumbia University · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) during chronic infection involves the rapid, continuous turnover of genetic diversity. However, the role of natural selection, relative to random genetic drift, in governing this process is unclear. We tested a stochastic model of genetic drift using partial envelope sequences sampled longitudinally in 28 infected children. In each case the Bayesian posterior (empirical) distribution of coalescent genealogies was estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Posterior predictive simulation was then used to generate a null distribution of genealogies assuming neutrality, with the null and empirical distributions compared using four genealogy-based summary statistics sensitive to nonneutral evolution. Because both null and empirical distributions were generated within a coalescent framework, we were able to explicitly account for the confounding influence of demography. From the distribution of corrected P-values across patients, we conclude that empirical genealogies are more asymmetric than expected if evolution is driven by mutation and genetic drift only, with an excess of low-frequency polymorphisms in the population. This indicates that although drift may still play an important role, natural selection has a strong influence on the evolution of HIV-1 envelope. A negative relationship between effective population size and substitution rate indicates that as the efficacy of selection increases, a smaller proportion of mutations approach fixation in the population. This suggests the presence of deleterious mutations. We therefore conclude that intrahost HIV-1 evolution in envelope is dominated by purifying selection against low-frequency deleterious mutations that do not reach fixation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic DriftHIV-1Selection, GeneticBase SequenceBayes TheoremChildChronic DiseaseComputer SimulationGene Products, envGenes, ViralHIV InfectionsHumansMolecular Sequence DataMonte Carlo MethodMutationGene Products, env

Identifiers

PMID16951087
PMCPMC1667091
OpenAlexW2126773783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.