Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16950846›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Filament compliance effects can explain tension overshoots during force development.

Kenneth S Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kenneth S CampbellDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA. k.s.campbell@uky.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatially explicit stochastic simulations of myosin S1 heads attaching to a single actin filament were used to investigate the process of force development in contracting muscle. Filament compliance effects were incorporated by adjusting the spacing between adjacent actin binding sites and adjacent myosin heads in response to cross-bridge attachment/detachment events. Appropriate model parameters were determined by multi-dimensional optimization and used to simulate force development records corresponding to different levels of Ca(2+) activation. Simulations in which the spacing between both adjacent actin binding sites and adjacent myosin S1 heads changed by approximately 0.06 nm after cross-bridge attachment/detachment events 1), exhibited tension overshoots with a Ca(2+) dependence similar to that measured experimentally and 2), mimicked the observed k(tr)-relative tension relationship without invoking a Ca(2+)-dependent increase in the rate of cross-bridge state transitions. Tension did not overshoot its steady-state value in control simulations modeling rigid thick and thin filaments with otherwise identical parameters. These results underline the importance of filament geometry and actin binding site availability in quantitative theories of muscle contraction.

Indexed as

ActinsAlgorithmsAnimalsBinding SitesBiophysicsCalciumKineticsModels, TheoreticalMonte Carlo MethodMuscle, SkeletalMyosinsMyosin SubfragmentsProtein ConformationRatsSarcomeresActinsCalciumMyosinsMyosin Subfragments

Identifiers

PMID16950846
PMCPMC1635681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.