Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16949359›Full record

ArticleBone2007

Quantitative Ultrasound--it is time to focus research efforts.

Claus-C Glüer

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Bone turnover markers are correlated with quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: 5-year longitudinal data.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2009
    Article
  5. Ultrasonic assessment of the radius in vitro.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2008
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A method for improved standardization of in vivo calcaneal time-domain speed-of-sound measurements.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Combining clinical factors and quantitative ultrasound improves the detection of women both at low and high risk for hip fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2007
    Article
  11. [Metabolic bone diseases].Der Internist · 2007
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation in vivo.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claus-C Glüer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) methods show great potential for refined assessment of bone strength. However, for widespread clinical acceptance, three issues have to be resolved: Will patients with low QUS readings benefit from approved osteoporosis medications? How can we ensure good quality of QUS measurements in daily clinical practice? How much added value does QUS bring to risk factor based case-finding strategies? When addressing these issues, differences among QUS approaches need to be recognized and vague and misleading terminology, e.g., regarding bone quality assessment, needs to be avoided. Innovations including assessment of material or micro-structural properties and direct QUS measurements at the proximal femur are likely to spark additional interest in pursuing QUS research.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesHumansOsteoporosisUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.