Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16949097›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2006

Co-evolutionary analysis of domains in interacting proteins reveals insights into domain-domain interactions mediating protein-protein interactions.

Raja Jothi, Praveen F Cherukuri, Asba Tasneem, Teresa M Przytycka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The functional importance of co-evolving residues in proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014
    Review
  15. Protein-protein interaction networks (PPI) and complex diseases.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2014
    Review
  16. Practical aspects of protein co-evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  17. Emerging methods in protein co-evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raja JothiNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. jothi@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Praveen F Cherukuri
Asba Tasneem
Teresa M Przytycka

Funding

New Algorithms for Detecting Sequence and Structure SimilaritiesZ01LM779892 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PRZYTYCKA, TERESA M. · 2003 to 2007
$159k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in functional genomics have helped generate large-scale high-throughput protein interaction data. Such networks, though extremely valuable towards molecular level understanding of cells, do not provide any direct information about the regions (domains) in the proteins that mediate the interaction. Here, we performed co-evolutionary analysis of domains in interacting proteins in order to understand the degree of co-evolution of interacting and non-interacting domains. Using a combination of sequence and structural analysis, we analyzed protein-protein interactions in F1-ATPase, Sec23p/Sec24p, DNA-directed RNA polymerase and nuclear pore complexes, and found that interacting domain pair(s) for a given interaction exhibits higher level of co-evolution than the non-interacting domain pairs. Motivated by this finding, we developed a computational method to test the generality of the observed trend, and to predict large-scale domain-domain interactions. Given a protein-protein interaction, the proposed method predicts the domain pair(s) that is most likely to mediate the protein interaction. We applied this method on the yeast interactome to predict domain-domain interactions, and used known domain-domain interactions found in PDB crystal structures to validate our predictions. Our results show that the prediction accuracy of the proposed method is statistically significant. Comparison of our prediction results with those from two other methods reveals that only a fraction of predictions are shared by all the three methods, indicating that the proposed method can detect known interactions missed by other methods. We believe that the proposed method can be used with other methods to help identify previously unrecognized domain-domain interactions on a genome scale, and could potentially help reduce the search space for identifying interaction sites.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProtein Interaction MappingAmino Acid SequenceCOP-Coated VesiclesDimerizationDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGTPase-Activating ProteinsKaryopherinsMembrane ProteinsMutationNuclear ProteinsNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryProton-Translocating ATPasesReproducibility of ResultsCSE1 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGTPase-Activating ProteinsKaryopherinsMembrane ProteinsNuclear ProteinsNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsProton-Translocating ATPasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSEC23 protein, S cerevisiaeSEC24 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID16949097
PMCPMC1618801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.