Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16945747›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2006

Differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes measured at rest and poststress by gated sestamibi SPECT.

Gautam Ramakrishna, Todd D Miller, David O Hodge, Michael K O'Connor, Raymond J Gibbons

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM/ESC guidelines for radionuclide imaging of cardiac function.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2008
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Reassessing the clinical significance of electrocardiographically unrecognized myocardial infarctions: Radionuclide infarct size and its impact on long-term prognosis.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  4. Prolonged left ventricular dysfunction following pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Should we be less stunned than in the past?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Do we need a new definition for post-stress reduction in LVEF beyond the numerical values?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Better characterization of dipyridamole-induced myocardial stunning by systolic wall thickening. A gated perfusion SPECT study.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Additional value of systolic wall thickening in myocardial stunning evaluated by stress-rest gated perfusion SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single injection, double acquisition: a double-edged sword?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gautam RamakrishnaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn., USA.
Todd D Miller
David O Hodge
Michael K O'Connor
Raymond J Gibbons
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome studies suggested that the poststress left ventricle ejection fraction (LV EF) is lower than rest LV EF in patients with stress-induced ischemia. METHODS AND

resultsBy using a 2-day protocol and 30 mCi Tc-99m sestamibi, LV EF, end-systolic volume (ESV), and end-diastolic volume (EDV) were measured with gated SPECT. Of 99 eligible patients, 91 had technically adequate studies. Poststress LV EF minus rest LV EF was defined as DeltaLV EF. DeltaEDV and DeltaESV were similarly defined. Rest and poststress LV EF (r = 0.89), EDV (r = 0.78), and ESV (r = 0.93) were highly correlated (P <.001). Rest LV EF, EDV, and ESV were not significantly different between patients with and without stress-induced ischemia. DeltaLV EF was significantly lower in patients with stress-induced ischemia (-3.5% +/- 4.5% vs -1.1% +/- 4.7%, P = .02). Mean LV EF poststress in ischemic patients was 55.0% +/- 10.5% vs 61.2% +/- 10.0% in nonischemic patients (P = .008). However, only 1 patient (3%) with ischemia had DeltaLV EF that exceeded the 95% confidence limit of DeltaLV EF for normal patients. Ischemia was significantly associated with increased DeltaEDV and DeltaESV (P < .01).

conclusionsStress-induced ischemia is associated with poststress reduction in LV EF and increased poststress EDV and ESV. However, the effect of ischemia on the difference between poststress and rest EF measurements is modest and rarely exceeds the confidence limits in normal patients undergoing 2-day protocols. In most patients, poststress LV EF is an accurate reflection of rest LV EF.

Indexed as

Ventricular Function, LeftAgedFemaleGated Blood-Pool ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIschemiaMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPerfusionRadiopharmaceuticalsStroke VolumeTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi

Identifiers

PMID16945747
OpenAlexW2020330480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.