ArticleMicrobial ecology2007
Protein extraction and fingerprinting optimization of bacterial communities in natural environment.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Detection of Nanoplastic Contamination in Plastic Labware by Dynamic Light Scattering Highlights Variations in Experimental Precision.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- The Requirement of Genetic Diagnostic Technologies for Environmental Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Triflic Acid Treatment Enables LC-MS/MS Analysis of Insoluble Bacterial Biomass.Journal of proteome research · 2018Article
- Article
- Metaproteomic analysis of bacterial communities in marine mudflat aquaculture sediment.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2015Article
- Interactions between snow chemistry, mercury inputs and microbial population dynamics in an Arctic snowpack.PloS one · 2013Article
- Exploring mixed microbial community functioning: recent advances in metaproteomics.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2012Review
- Molecular biomass and MetaTaxogenomic assessment of soil microbial communities as influenced by soil DNA extraction procedure.Microbial biotechnology · 2012Article
- Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel protein electrophoresis of freshwater photosynthetic sulfur bacteria.Current microbiology · 2011Article
- A metaproteomic analysis of the human salivary microbiota by three-dimensional peptide fractionation and tandem mass spectrometry.Molecular oral microbiology · 2010Article
- Microbial protein in soil: influence of extraction method and C amendment on extraction and recovery.Microbial ecology · 2010Article
- Microbial community profiling to investigate transmission of bacteria between life stages of the wood-boring beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis.Microbial ecology · 2009Article
- Metaproteomics: a new approach for studying functional microbial ecology.Microbial ecology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent development in molecular approaches allows access to genetic structure and diversity of indigenous microbial communities. In contrast, the functional analysis of microorganisms in their environment is still hampered by methodological limitations. Analysis of total proteins expressed at the whole community level (metaproteome) has been proposed to characterize the functional structure of microbial communities in their environment. However, developments are still required to perform such analysis. Our aim was to optimize methods to extract and characterize metaproteome of indigenous microbial communities. Experiments were first conducted in monoxenic bacterial cultures, and various methods were examined to define a procedure of protein extraction ensuring an efficient recovery regardless of the taxonomic affiliation of the cells. These developments were next applied to characterize the metaproteome from indigenous bacterial communities in freshwater samples. Bacterial cells were recovered from water using a high-speed density gradient centrifugation method before protein extraction and fingerprinting. The reactivity and sensitivity of this metaproteomic approach were tested by analyzing the variations of protein fingerprints according to perturbations (cadmium or mercury contamination). The genetic structure of the corresponding communities was also characterized by automated ribosomal spacer analysis (ARISA) DNA fingerprinting. Both protein and DNA fingerprints were statistically analyzed. Results obtained showed that the method developed for protein recovery and fingerprinting was efficient, sensitive, and reproducible. Both the functional and genetic structures of the freshwater bacterial community were complex and varied with perturbations. These variations occurred at both population and protein expression levels and were specific to the perturbation applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16944344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.