Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16944286›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2006

Fusarium genomic resources: tools to limit crop diseases and mycotoxin contamination.

Daren W Brown, Robert A E Butchko, Robert H Proctor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revealing Hidden Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daren W BrownMycotoxin Research Group, USDA/ARS, 1815 N University St, Peoria, IL 61604, USA. browndw@ncaur.usda.gov
Robert A E Butchko
Robert H Proctor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been almost 10 years since Joan Bennett suggested that fungal biologists create a "wish list" for fungal genome sequences (Bennett JW. White paper: Genomics for filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 1997; 21: 3-7). The availability of over 200 review papers concerning fungal genomics is a reflection of significant progress with a diversity of fungal species. Although much progress has been made, the use of genomic data to study mycotoxin synthesis and function, pathogenesis and other aspects of fungal biology is in its infancy. Here, we briefly present the status of publicly available genomic resources for Fusarium, a genus of important plant pathogenic and mycotoxin-producing fungi of worldwide concern. Preliminary examination of microarray data collected from F. verticillioides liquid cultures provides evidence of widespread differential gene expression over time.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalFood ContaminationFumonisinsFusariumGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome, FungalMultigene FamilyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlant DiseasesTranscription, GeneticVirulenceFumonisins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.