Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16944283›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2006

Understanding the genetics of regulation of aflatoxin production and Aspergillus flavus development.

Deepak Bhatnagar, Jeffrey W Cary, Kenneth Ehrlich, Jiujiang Yu, Thomas E Cleveland

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Molecular Mechanism of Aflatoxin BJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Aspergillus Mycotoxins: The Major Food Contaminants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The GeneToxins · 2024
    Article
  11. Occurrence of mycotoxins in swine feed from South Korea.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing and Its Application inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Toxins · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deepak BhatnagarFood and Feed Safety Research Unit, U.S.D.A., A.R.S., Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA. dbhatnag@srrc.ars.usda.gov
Jeffrey W Cary
Kenneth Ehrlich
Jiujiang Yu
Thomas E Cleveland
Southern Regional Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aflatoxins are polyketide-derived, toxic, and carcinogenic secondary metabolites produced primarily by two fungal species, Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus, on crops such as corn, peanuts, cottonseed, and treenuts. Regulatory guidelines issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prevent sale of commodities if contamination by these toxins exceeds certain levels. The biosynthesis of these toxins has been extensively studied. About 15 stable precursors have been identified. The genes involved in encoding the proteins required for the oxidative and regulatory steps in the biosynthesis are clustered in a 70 kb portion of chromosome 3 in the A. flavus genome. With the characterization of the gene cluster, new insights into the cellular processes that govern the genes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis have been revealed, but the signaling processes that turn on aflatoxin biosynthesis during fungal contamination of crops are still not well understood. New molecular technologies, such as gene microarray analyses, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and chromatin immunoprecipitation are being used to understand how physiological stress, environmental and soil conditions, receptivity of the plant, and fungal virulence lead to episodic outbreaks of aflatoxin contamination in certain commercially important crops. With this fundamental understanding, we will be better able to design improved non-aflatoxigenic biocompetitive Aspergillus strains and develop inhibitors of aflatoxin production (native to affected crops or otherwise) amenable to agricultural application for enhancing host-resistance against fungal invasion or toxin production. Comparisons of aflatoxin-producing species with other fungal species that retain some of the genes required for aflatoxin formation is expected to provide insight into the evolution of the aflatoxin gene cluster, and its role in fungal physiology. Therefore, information on how and why the fungus makes the toxin will be valuable for developing an effective and lasting strategy for control of aflatoxin contamination.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsAspergillus flavusChromosomes, FungalCrops, AgriculturalExpressed Sequence TagsGenes, FungalMultigene FamilyPolymerase Chain ReactionSoilTranscription, GeneticAflatoxinsSoil

Identifiers

PMID16944283
OpenAlexW1968409946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.