Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16944081›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2006

[Relative value of plain vitamin D and of biologically active vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis].

S Scharla

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

S ScharlaPraxis für Innere Medizin, Bad Reichenhall. Dr.Scharla@t-online.de
Praxis · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D metabolism has an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Vitamin D deficiency is very common in elderly people in central Europe. This leads to secondary hyperparathyroidism and to increased bone resorption, resulting in osteoporosis. Combined with the elevated risk of falling that results from vitamin D deficiency, this increases the frequency of bone fractures. Severe vitamin D deficiency also causes impaired bone mineralization (osteomalacia). Controlled intervention trials with native vitamin D (and calcium) yielded no consistent results in terms of the prevention of extravertebral fractures. It appears likely that treatment with plain vitamin D is effective only in populations with vitamin D deficiency. Treatment with active vitamin D (1-alpha-hydroxylated metabolites such as alfacalcidol) has to be considered a pharmacological intervention that exerts pleiotropic effects on the gut (calcium absorption), bone (stimulation of formation), muscle (decreasing of the risk of falling), and immune system. Target groups are patients with disturbed vitamin D metabolism (renal insufficiency, glucocorticoid therapy, inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis). Alfacalcidol can prevent glucocorticoid-induced bone loss (high-grade evidence). In comparative studies alfacalcidol was superior to plain vitamin D.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsFractures, SpontaneousHumansOsteoporosisRisk FactorsVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyBone Density Conservation AgentsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID16944081
OpenAlexW46462446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.