ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2006
[Relative value of plain vitamin D and of biologically active vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential for vitamin D receptor agonists in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.British journal of pharmacology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin D metabolism has an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Vitamin D deficiency is very common in elderly people in central Europe. This leads to secondary hyperparathyroidism and to increased bone resorption, resulting in osteoporosis. Combined with the elevated risk of falling that results from vitamin D deficiency, this increases the frequency of bone fractures. Severe vitamin D deficiency also causes impaired bone mineralization (osteomalacia). Controlled intervention trials with native vitamin D (and calcium) yielded no consistent results in terms of the prevention of extravertebral fractures. It appears likely that treatment with plain vitamin D is effective only in populations with vitamin D deficiency. Treatment with active vitamin D (1-alpha-hydroxylated metabolites such as alfacalcidol) has to be considered a pharmacological intervention that exerts pleiotropic effects on the gut (calcium absorption), bone (stimulation of formation), muscle (decreasing of the risk of falling), and immune system. Target groups are patients with disturbed vitamin D metabolism (renal insufficiency, glucocorticoid therapy, inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis). Alfacalcidol can prevent glucocorticoid-induced bone loss (high-grade evidence). In comparative studies alfacalcidol was superior to plain vitamin D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.