ReviewMolecular biotechnology2006
Cataloging the relationships between proteins: a review of interaction databases.
Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PrePPI: a structure-informed database of protein-protein interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Article
- OntoSlug: a dynamic visual front-end program for ontologies.Bioinformation · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By organizing and making widely accessible the increasing amounts of data from high-throughput analyses, protein interaction databases have become an integral resource for the biological community in relating sequence data with higher-order function. To provide a sense of the use and applicability of these databases, we describe each of the major comprehensive interaction databases as well as some of the more specialized ones. Content description, search/browse functionalities, and data presentation are discussed. A succinct explanation of database contents helps the user quickly identify whether the database contains applicable information to their research interest. Broad levels of search/browse functions as well as descriptions/examples allow users to quickly find and access pertinent data. At this point, clear presentation of search results as well as the primary content is necessary. Many databases display information graphically or divided into smaller digestible parts over a number of tabbed/linked pages. In addition, cross-linking between the databases promotes interconnectivity of the data and is an added layer of relational data for the user. Overall, although these protein interaction databases are under continual improvement, their current state shows that much time and effort has gone into organizing and presenting these large sets of data-describing protein interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16943573What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.