Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16942674›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2006

Ependymomas.

Sajeel Chowdhary, Myke R Green, Marc Chamberlain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sajeel ChowdharyDepartment of Interdisciplinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Neuro-Oncology Program, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Myke R Green
Marc Chamberlain
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal management of ependymomas includes surgical resection and evaluation of the extent of central nervous system involvement using cerebrospinal fluid cytology and craniospinal contrast-enhanced MRI. In instances of measurable residual disease, reoperation should be considered because survival of patients with ependymomas is significantly improved by performance of a complete resection. In patients not considered for further surgery and with residual disease, limited-field radiotherapy is usually administered. The role of craniospinal irradiation in patients with local disease and no evidence of metastasis is controversial because most tumor recurrences are local and at the site of the primary tumor. No clear role for adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated. When used, chemotherapy for ependymomas has been administered primarily to children aged younger than 3 years as adjuvant therapy and to patients with recurrent disease who are not considered surgical candidates as salvage therapy. Recurrent ependymomas are managed by reoperation of tumors that are surgically accessible, by radiotherapy if not previously administered, and by salvage chemotherapy. The role of stereotactic radiotherapy administered as radiosurgery or brachytherapy is unclear because all reports are anecdotal. Because salvage chemotherapy is not curative, no standard therapy exists, and a variety of chemotherapy agents and drug schedules have been investigated.

Identifiers

PMID16942674
OpenAlexW3189763153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.