ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006
Efficacy of cethromycin, a new ketolide, against Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptible or resistant to erythromycin in a murine pneumonia model.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel ketolide, RBx 14255, with activity against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cethromycin is a ketolide with in vitro activity against macrolide-sensitive and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. We compared its in vivo efficacy to erythromycin in a mouse model of acute pneumonia induced by two virulent clinical strains: a serotype 3 susceptible strain (P-4241) (MICs: erythromycin, 0.03 microg/ml; cethromycin, 0.015 microg/ml) and a serotype 1 strain resistant to erythromycin (P-6254; phenotypically MLSB constitutive) (MICs: erythromycin, 1,024 microg/ml; cethromycin, 0.03 microg/ml). Immunocompetent mice were infected with 10(5) CFU of each strain. Six treatments given either subcutaneously (s.c.) or per os (p.o.) at 12-h intervals were initiated at 6 or 12 h after infection. Against P-4241, cethromycin given s.c. at 25 or 12.5 mg/kg protected 100% of the animals, with lungs and blood completely cleared of bacteria. Given p.o., cethromycin maintained its efficacy with 100 and 86% survival at 25 and 12.5 mg/kg, respectively. Erythromycin, given s.c. at 50 or 37.5 mg/kg, provided 50 and 38% survival rates, respectively. Against P-6254, cethromycin was effective at 25 mg/kg (100% survival) regardless of the administration route, whereas only 25 and 8% of animals survived after a 75-mg/kg erythromycin treatment given s.c. and p.o., respectively. The serum protein binding levels of cethromycin were 94.8 and 88.5% after doses of 12.5 and 25 mg/kg, respectively. The higher in vivo activity of cethromycin compared to erythromycin could be explained by favorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indexes against P-6254 but not against P-4241.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.