ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006
Efficacy of novel rifamycin derivatives against rifamycin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in murine models of infection.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Enzymatic Activity of Inosine 5'-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase May Not Be a Vulnerable Target forACS infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Efficacy of benzoxazinorifamycins in a mouse model of Chlamydia pneumoniae lung infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2008Article
- Efficacy of a novel rifamycin derivative, ABI-0043, against Staphylococcus aureus in an experimental model of foreign-body infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel rifamycins (new chemical entities [NCEs]) having MICs of 0.002 to 0.03 microg/ml against Staphylococcus aureus and retaining some activity against rifampin-resistant mutants were tested for in vivo efficacy against susceptible and rifampin-resistant strains of S. aureus. Rifalazil and rifampin had a 50% effective dose (ED50) of 0.06 mg/kg of body weight when administered as a single intravenous (i.v.) dose in a murine septicemia model against a susceptible strain of S. aureus. The majority of NCEs showed efficacy at a lower i.v. dose (0.003 to 0.06 mg/kg). In addition, half of the NCEs tested for oral efficacy had ED50s in the range of 0.015 to 0.13 mg/kg, i.e., lower or equivalent to the oral ED50s of rifampin and rifalazil. NCEs were also tested in the septicemia model against a rifampin-resistant strain of S. aureus. Twenty-four of 169 NCEs were efficacious when administered as a single oral dose of 80 mg/kg. These NCEs were examined in the murine thigh infection model against a susceptible strain of S. aureus. Several NCEs dosed by intraperitoneal injection at 0.06 mg/kg caused a significant difference in bacterial titer compared with placebo-treated animals. No NCEs showed efficacy in the thigh model against a highly rifampin-resistant strain. However, several NCEs showed an effect when tested against a partially rifampin-resistant strain. The NCEs having a 25-hydroxyl moiety were more effective as a group than their 25-O-acetyl counterparts. These model systems defined candidate NCEs as components of potential combination therapies to treat systemic infections or as monotherapeutic agents for topical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.