Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16939975›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2006

Recapitulate development to promote axonal regeneration: good or bad approach?

Marie T Filbin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A miR-383-5p Signaling Hub Coordinates the Axon Regeneration Response to Inflammation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensory Axon Growth Requires Spatiotemporal Integration of CaSR and TrkB Signaling.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Review of the regeneration mechanism of complete spinal cord injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. In vitro models of axon regeneration.Experimental neurology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marie T FilbinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA. filbin@genectr.hunter.cuny.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade there has been an explosion in our understanding, at the molecular level, of why axons in the adult, mammalian central nervous system (CNS) do not spontaneously regenerate while their younger counterparts do. Now a number of inhibitors of axonal regeneration have been described, some of the receptors they interact with to transduce the inhibitory signal are known, as are some of the steps in the signal transduction pathway that is responsible for inhibition. In addition, developmental changes in the environment and in the neurons themselves are also now better understood. This knowledge in turn reveals novel, putative sites for drug development and therapeutic intervention after injury to the brain and spinal cord. The challenge now is to determine which of these putative treatments are the most effective and if they would be better applied in combination rather than alone. In this review I will summarize what we have learnt about these molecules and how they signal. Importantly, I will also describe approaches that have been shown to block inhibitors and encourage regeneration in vivo. I will also speculate on what the differences are between the neonatal and adult CNS that allow the former to regenerate and the latter not to.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCentral Nervous SystemRegenerationSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID16939975
PMCPMC1664663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.