ReviewGenome biology2006
The elusive yeast interactome.
Review in Genome biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- ToxoNet: A high confidence map of protein-protein interactions in Toxoplasma gondii.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Multiparameter screen optimizes immunoprecipitation.BioTechniques · 2024Article
- Article
- The protein interactome of the citrus Huanglongbing pathogen Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- The Frequent Network Neighborhood Mapping of the human hippocampus shows much more frequent neighbor sets in males than in females.PloS one · 2020Article
- The Balancing Act of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Enabling Functional Diversity while Minimizing Promiscuity.Journal of molecular biology · 2019Article
- Affinity proteomics to study endogenous protein complexes: pointers, pitfalls, preferences and perspectives.BioTechniques · 2015Article
- Mapping the Protein-Protein Interactome Networks Using Yeast Two-Hybrid Screens.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2015Review
- Predicting physical interactions between protein complexes.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2013Article
- Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: from the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012Review
- Quantitative maps of genetic interactions in yeast - comparative evaluation and integrative analysis.BMC systems biology · 2011Article
- Building macromolecular assemblies by information-driven docking: introducing the HADDOCK multibody docking server.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2010Article
- High throughput protein-protein interaction data: clues for the architecture of protein complexes.Proteome science · 2008Article
- Global investigation of protein-protein interactions in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using re-occurring short polypeptide sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Article
- Chromatin Central: towards the comparative proteome by accurate mapping of the yeast proteomic environment.Genome biology · 2008Article
- A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data.Genome biology · 2007Review
- Coverage and error models of protein-protein interaction data by directed graph analysis.Genome biology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simple eukaryotic cells such as yeast could contain around 800 protein complexes, as two new comprehensive studies show. But slightly different approaches resulted in surprising differences between the two datasets, showing that more work is required to get a complete picture of the yeast interactome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.