ArticleProtoplasma2006
The relationship between induction of embryogenesis and chromosome doubling in microspore cultures.
Article in Protoplasma, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods for Chromosome Doubling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- In vitro androgenesis: spontaneous vs. artificial genome doubling and characterization of regenerants.Plant cell reports · 2020Review
- Aneuploidy among androgenic progeny of hexaploid triticale (XTriticosecale Wittmack).Plant cell reports · 2011Article
- Enhanced induction of microspore embryogenesis after n-butanol treatment in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther culture.Plant cell reports · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to review the relationship between induction of microspore embryogenesis and chromosome doubling. It has been augmented with relative data on chromosome doubling by nuclear fusion. Some of the treatments used for induction of embryogenesis may also lead to doubling of the chromosome number, either through nuclear fusion or endomitosis. High frequencies of spontaneous chromosome doubling in cereal species appear to be induced by treatments that block cell wall formation during the first cell divisions, resulting in coenocytic cells in which the nuclei are able to fuse. The use of mannitol as a pretreatment for induction of embryogenesis in barley, wheat, and maize microspore cultures provides examples of nuclear fusion. The use of antimicrotubule agents for embryo induction via treatments during the first few hours of microspore culture has also resulted in high frequencies of chromosome doubling. Factors such as the doubling agent concentration, temperature during treatment, and duration of treatment may be critical for individual species. Actin filament as well as microtubule assembly studies related to new cell wall formation provide further evidence at the molecular level for the relationship between microspore embryogenesis and chromosome doubling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.