ArticleJournal of plant research2006
Phylogenetic analyses of Malpighiales using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences, with particular reference to the embryology of Euphorbiaceae sens. str.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide terpene gene clusters analysis in Euphorbiaceae.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Characterization of the plastid genome of Cratoxylum species (Hypericaceae) and new insights into phylogenetic relationships.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Frequent ploidy changes in Salicaceae indicates widespread sharing of the salicoid whole genome duplication by the relatives of Populus L. and Salix L.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Enhancement in Oral Absorption of Ceftriaxone by Highly Functionalized Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- DNA barcoding and TLC as tools to properly identify natural populations of the Mexican medicinal species Galphimia glauca Cav.PloS one · 2019Article
- Transcriptomics Identifies Modules of Differentially Expressed Genes and Novel Cyclotides inFrontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Structure and development of flowers and inflorescences in Peraceae and Euphorbiaceae and the evolution of pseudanthia in Malpighiales.PloS one · 2018Article
- Multidisciplinary studies of the diversity and evolution in river-weeds.Journal of plant research · 2016Review
- Molecular phylogenetics, seed morphometrics, chromosome number evolution and systematics of EuropeanPeerJ · 2016Article
- It's Not Easy Being Blue: Are There Olfactory and Visual Trade-Offs in Plant Signalling?PloS one · 2015Article
- From gene trees to a dated allopolyploid network: insights from the angiosperm genus Viola (Violaceae).Systematic biology · 2015Article
- Production of bioactive diterpenoids in the euphorbiaceae depends on evolutionarily conserved gene clusters.The Plant cell · 2014Article
- Long-term morphological stasis maintained by a plant-pollinator mutualism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Advances in the floral structural characterization of the major subclades of Malpighiales, one of the largest orders of flowering plants.Annals of botany · 2013Review
- DNA barcoding of the Mexican sedative and anxiolytic plant Galphimia glauca.Journal of ethnopharmacology · 2012Article
- Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Passifloraceae sensu lato (Malpighiales) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences.Journal of plant research · 2012Article
- Embryology of the Irvingiaceae, a family with uncertain relationships among the Malpighiales.Journal of plant research · 2011Article
- Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Violaceae (Malpighiales) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences.Journal of plant research · 2008Article
- Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: exploring the organ-flower-inflorescence boundary.American journal of botany · 2007Article
- Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences and ovule and seed character evolution.Journal of plant research · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present phylogenetic analyses of Malpighiales, which are poorly understood with respect to relationships within the order, using sequences from rbcL, atpB, matK and 18SrDNA from 103 genera in 23 families. From several independent and variously combined analyses, a four-gene analysis using all sequence data provided the best resolution, resulting in the single most parsimonious tree. In the Malpighiales [bootstrap support (BS) 100%], more than eight major clades comprising a family or group of families successively diverged, but no clade containing more than six families received over 50% BS. Instead, ten terminal clades that supported close relationships between and among families (>50% BS) were obtained, between, for example, Balanopaceae and Chrysobalanaceae; Lacistemataceae and Salicaceae; and Phyllanthaceae and Picrodendraceae. The monophyly of Euphorbiaceae sens. str. were strongly supported (BS 100%), but its sister group was unclear. Euphorbiaceae sens. str. comprised two basally diverging clades (BS 100%): one leading to the Clutia group (Chaetocarpus, Clutia, Pera and Trigonopleura), and the other leading to the rest of the family. The latter shared a palisadal, instead of a tracheoidal exotegmen as a morphological synapomorphy. While both Acalyphoideae (excluding Dicoelia and the Clutia group) and Euphorbioideae are monophyletic, Crotonoideae were paraphyletic, requiring more comprehensive analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.