Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16933979›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2006

The ion channel inverse problem: neuroinformatics meets biophysics.

Robert C Cannon, Giampaolo D'Alessandro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Four Ways to Fit an Ion Channel Model.Biophysical journal · 2019
    Article
  10. Phenomenological models of NaScientific reports · 2019
    Article
  11. Reproducible model development in the cardiac electrophysiology Web Lab.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methods for quantification of pore-voltage sensor interaction in Ca(V)1.2.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2014
    Article
  17. The biology of the glutamatergic system and potential role in migraine.International journal of biomedical science : IJBS · 2013
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert C CannonDepartment of Psychology Center for Memory and Brain, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. robert@textensor.com
Giampaolo D'Alessandro

Funding

A Spiking Model of Hippocampus for Guiding BehaviorR01DA016454 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2002 to 2006
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA16454NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ion channels are the building blocks of the information processing capability of neurons: any realistic computational model of a neuron must include reliable and effective ion channel components. Sophisticated statistical and computational tools have been developed to study the ion channel structure-function relationship, but this work is rarely incorporated into the models used for single neurons or small networks. The disjunction is partly a matter of convention. Structure-function studies typically use a single Markov model for the whole channel whereas until recently whole-cell modeling software has focused on serial, independent, two-state subunits that can be represented by the Hodgkin-Huxley equations. More fundamentally, there is a difference in purpose that prevents models being easily reused. Biophysical models are typically developed to study one particular aspect of channel gating in detail, whereas neural modelers require broad coverage of the entire range of channel behavior that is often best achieved with approximate representations that omit structural features that cannot be adequately constrained. To bridge the gap so that more recent channel data can be used in neural models requires new computational infrastructure for bringing together diverse sources of data to arrive at best-fit models for whole-cell modeling. We review the current state of channel modeling and explore the developments needed for its conclusions to be integrated into whole-cell modeling.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalBiophysicsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsModels, ChemicalNeurosciencesIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID16933979
PMCPMC1553477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.