ArticlePLoS computational biology2006
An integrative method for accurate comparative genome mapping.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- GSAlign: an efficient sequence alignment tool for intra-species genomes.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Primary orthologs from local sequence context.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- YOC, A new strategy for pairwise alignment of collinear genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes.Genome biology · 2014Article
- Efficient large-scale protein sequence comparison and gene matching to identify orthologs and co-orthologs.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Positional orthology: putting genomic evolutionary relationships into context.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2011Review
- Article
- Assessing the quality of whole genome alignments in bacteria.Advances in bioinformatics · 2009Article
- A methodological framework for the reconstruction of contiguous regions of ancestral genomes and its application to mammalian genomes.PLoS computational biology · 2008Article
- Precise detection of rearrangement breakpoints in mammalian chromosomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- Genome classification by gene distribution: an overlapping subspace clustering approach.BMC evolutionary biology · 2008Article
- Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data.BMC evolutionary biology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present MAGIC, an integrative and accurate method for comparative genome mapping. Our method consists of two phases: preprocessing for identifying "maximal similar segments," and mapping for clustering and classifying these segments. MAGIC's main novelty lies in its biologically intuitive clustering approach, which aims towards both calculating reorder-free segments and identifying orthologous segments. In the process, MAGIC efficiently handles ambiguities resulting from duplications that occurred before the speciation of the considered organisms from their most recent common ancestor. We demonstrate both MAGIC's robustness and scalability: the former is asserted with respect to its initial input and with respect to its parameters' values. The latter is asserted by applying MAGIC to distantly related organisms and to large genomes. We compare MAGIC to other comparative mapping methods and provide detailed analysis of the differences between them. Our improvements allow a comprehensive study of the diversity of genetic repertoires resulting from large-scale mutations, such as indels and duplications, including explicitly transposable and phagic elements. The strength of our method is demonstrated by detailed statistics computed for each type of these large-scale mutations. MAGIC enabled us to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the different forces shaping prokaryotic genomes from different clades, and to quantify the importance of novel gene content introduced by horizontal gene transfer relative to gene duplication in bacterial genome evolution. We use these results to investigate the breakpoint distribution in several prokaryotic genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.