Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16933971›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2006

Disruption-induced mucus secretion: repair and protection.

K Miyake, T Tanaka, P L McNeil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mucus.Current biology : CB · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. IL-9 and Th9 in parasite immunity.Seminars in immunopathology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diversity and dialogue in immunity to helminths.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2011
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Rehabilitation and the single cell.Current opinion in cell biology · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K MiyakeInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, United States of America.
T Tanaka
P L McNeil

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a cell suffers a plasma membrane disruption, extracellular Ca(2+) rapidly diffuses into its cytosol, triggering there local homotypic and exocytotic membrane fusion events. One role of this emergency exocytotic response is to promote cell survival: the internal membrane thus added to the plasma membrane acts as a reparative "patch." Another, unexplored consequence of disruption-induced exocytosis is secretion. Many of the cells lining the gastrointestinal tract secrete mucus via a compound exocytotic mechanism, and these and other epithelial cell types lining the digestive tract are normally subject to plasma membrane disruption injury in vivo. Here we show that plasma membrane disruption triggers a potent mucus secretory response from stomach mucous cells wounded in vitro by shear stress or by laser irradiation. This disruption-induced secretory response is Ca(2+) dependent, and coupled to cell resealing: disruption in the absence of Ca(2+) does not trigger mucus release, but results instead in cell death due to failure to reseal. Ca(2+)-dependent, disruption-induced mucus secretion and resealing were also demonstrable in segments of intact rat large intestine. We propose that, in addition to promoting cell survival of membrane disruptions, disruption-induced exocytosis serves also the important protective function of liberating lubricating mucus at sites of mechanical wear and tear. This mode of mechanotransduction can, we propose, explain how lubrication in the gastrointestinal tract is rapidly and precisely adjusted to widely fluctuating, diet-dependent levels of mechanical stress.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell MembraneGastric MucosaHumansMucusRatsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID16933971
PMCPMC1544361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.