Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16931634›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2006

A randomized clinical trial of peak flow versus symptom monitoring in older adults with asthma.

A Sonia Buist, William M Vollmer, Sandra R Wilson, E Ann Frazier, Arthur D Hayward

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with fixed airflow obstruction in older adults with asthma.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2010
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Living well with severe asthma.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2019
    Review
  11. The current state and provisions for elderly patients with asthma.Journal of general and family medicine · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of asthma in the elderly patient.Clinical interventions in aging · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Saudi Initiative for Asthma.Annals of thoracic medicine · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Sonia BuistOregon Health & Science University, Mail Code UHN 67, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. buists@ohsu.edu
William M Vollmer
Sandra R Wilson
E Ann Frazier
Arthur D Hayward
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

PEAK FLOW MONITORING IN OLDER ADULTS WITH ASTHMAR01HL052598 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BUIST, ALINE SONIA · 1994 to 1998
–
NHLBI NIH HHS 1-R01-HL52598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether peak flow monitoring has value above and beyond symptom monitoring when used as part of an asthma management plan.

methodsFrom a large managed-care organization, 296 adults, aged 50-92 yr, were recruited and randomly assigned in equal numbers to either use of symptoms or peak flow rate (twice daily or "as needed") for asthma monitoring, and monitored every 6 mo for 2 yr. Interventions were delivered in four 90-min small-group classes and included a personalized action plan and coaching in proper use of asthma inhalers.

resultsWe found no significant differences between peak flow rate and symptom monitoring, or between twice-daily and as-needed peak flow monitoring in the primary or secondary study outcomes: health care utilization (acute, nonacute, or total asthma visits), Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores, and lung function. AQLQ scores and prebronchodilator FEV1 increased significantly for both groups between baseline and 6 mo (AQLQ: mean, 0.4 units; 95% confidence interval, 0.3, 0.5; p < 0.0001; FEV1% predicted: mean, 4%). Inhaler technique improved substantially in both groups.

conclusionsPeak flow monitoring has no advantage over symptom monitoring as an asthma management strategy for older adults with moderate-severe asthma when used in a comprehensive asthma management program. Improved outcomes in both groups suggest that understanding proper medication use, regular monitoring of asthma status, and understanding how to respond to changes are of primary importance.

Indexed as

Peak Expiratory Flow RateAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaFemaleHumansMaleMetered Dose InhalersMonitoring, PhysiologicQuality of LifeSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID16931634
PMCPMC2648108
OpenAlexW2138395556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.