ArticleBMC cancer2006
Bcl-XL is qualitatively different from and ten times more effective than Bcl-2 when expressed in a breast cancer cell line.
Article in BMC cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging biomarkers in breast fibroadenoma: implications for differential diagnosis, malignant transformation, and precision medicine.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- A unified therapeutic theory for treating cancer via master regulators of the universal apoptosis network.Cell death discovery · 2026Review
- Targeting BCL-xL in Myeloid Malignancies: From Inhibitors to PROTAC.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- DrugBank mining with machine learning reveals novel candidates for BCL-2 inhibition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic marker Musashi-2 modulates DNA damage response and radioresistance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Light-Promoted Lysosomal Escape of a Phthalocyanine and Antisense Oligonucleotide-Complexed G-Quadruplex for Dual Photodynamic and Antisense Therapy.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Dexamethasone-tamoxifen combination exerts synergistic therapeutic effects in tamoxifen-resistance breast cancer cells.Bioscience reports · 2024Article
- Hallmarks of cancer resistance.iScience · 2024Review
- In Vitro Inhibition of Colorectal Cancer Gene Targets byNutrients · 2024Article
- The Investigation ofReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2024Article
- MAP3K1 expression is associated with progression and poor prognosis of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- A recombinant adenovirus vector containing theFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Survival and Neurogenesis-Promoting Effects of the Co-Overexpression ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Senolytic-Mediated Elimination of Head and Neck Tumor Cells Induced Into Senescence by Cisplatin.Molecular pharmacology · 2022Article
- Sensitization effect of kaempferol from persimmon leaves on HepG2 hepatoma cells with ABT-199 resistance and its molecular mechanisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Making Sense of Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapeutics Targeting Bcl-2.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Transcript-Level Dysregulation ofCancers · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBcl-2 and Bcl-XL are anti-apoptotic paralogues that inhibit apoptosis elicited by a wide variety of stimuli, and play critical roles in cancer development and resistance to treatment. Many clinical studies have indicated that expression of these anti-apoptotic proteins in tumours is associated with poor prognosis. It has therefore been assumed that in cells the essential difference between Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL involves regulation of expression and that they are otherwise functionally similar. To examine this issue, we have compared the function of the proteins and of mutants of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL specifically targeted to different subcellular sites.
methodsWe generated clones of the human breast cancer line MCF-7 stably expressing known amounts of Bcl-2, or Bcl-XL as determined by quantitative immunoblotting. Clones expressing equivalent amounts of wild-type and mutants of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL with subcellular localization restricted to the cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum or outer mitochondrial membrane were studied in both MCF-7 and Rat-1 fibroblasts. In MCF-7 cells we measured the functional activities of these proteins in preventing apoptosis induced by four different agents (doxorubicin, ceramide, thapsigargin, TNF-alpha). Etoposide and low serum were used to compare the effect of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and mutants located at the endoplasmic reticulum on induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts.
resultsWe noted both qualitative and quantitative differences in the functional activity of these two anti-apoptotic proteins in cells: Bcl-2 localized to the endoplasmic reticulum inhibits apoptosis induced by ceramide and thapsigargin but not by doxorubicin or TNFalpha, while Bcl-XL at the endoplasmic reticulum is active against all four drugs. In fibroblasts Bcl-2 localized to the ER did not prevent cell death due to etoposide whereas Bcl-XL in the same location did. Finally in MCF-7 cells, Bcl-XL is approximately ten times more active than Bcl-2 in repressing apoptosis induced by doxorubicin. This difference can be manifest as a large difference in clonal survival.
conclusionWhen examined in the same cellular context, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL differ substantially in the potency with which they inhibit apoptosis, mediated in part by differences in the inhibition of specific subcellular pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.