Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16928151›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2006

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of CNS tumours.

Susannah Motl, Yanli Zhuang, Christopher M Waters, Clinton F Stewart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Clinical Experience With Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The Use of Anthracyclines for Therapy of CNS Tumors.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Multimodal imaging enables early detection and characterization of changes in tumor permeability of brain metastases.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susannah MotlDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Yanli Zhuang
Christopher M Waters
Clinton F Stewart
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

XENOGRAFT STUDIESP01CA023099 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI STEWART, CLINTON F · 1985 to 2011
$22.4M
ABC Transporters in CNS Penetration of CamptothecinsR01GM071321 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI WATERS, CHRISTOPHER M · 2004 to 2007
$879k
NCI NIH HHS CA23099NIGMS NIH HHS GM071321NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite aggressive therapy, the majority of primary and metastatic brain tumour patients have a poor prognosis with brief survival periods. This is because of the different pharmacokinetic parameters of systemically administered chemotherapeutic agents between the brain and the rest of the body. Specifically, before systemically administered drugs can distribute into the CNS, they must cross two membrane barriers, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier (BCB). To some extent, these structures function to exclude xenobiotics, such as anticancer drugs, from the brain. An understanding of these unique barriers is essential to predict when and how systemically administered drugs will be transported to the brain. Specifically, factors such as physiological variables (e.g. blood flow), physicochemical properties of the drug (e.g. molecular weight), as well as influx and efflux transporter expression at the BBB and BCB (e.g. adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporters) determine what compounds reach the CNS. A large body of preclinical and clinical research exists regarding brain penetration of anticancer agents. In most cases, a surrogate endpoint (i.e. CSF to plasma area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] ratio) is used to describe how effectively agents can be transported into the CNS. Some agents, such as the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, have high CSF to plasma AUC ratios, making them valid therapeutic options for primary and metastatic brain tumours. In contrast, other agents like the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, have a low CSF to plasma AUC ratio. Knowledge of these data can have important clinical implications. For example, it is now known that chronic myelogenous leukaemia patients treated with imatinib might need additional CNS prophylaxis. Since most anticancer agents have limited brain penetration, new pharmacological approaches are needed to enhance delivery into the brain. BBB disruption, regional administration of chemotherapy and transporter modulation are all currently being evaluated in an effort to improve therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, since many chemotherapeutic agents are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 3A enzyme system, minimising drug interactions by avoiding concomitant drug therapies that are also metabolised through this system may potentially enhance outcomes. Specifically, the use of non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs and curtailing nonessential corticosteroid use may have an impact.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsCamptothecinCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicCyclophosphamideDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMethotrexateAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCamptothecinCyclophosphamideMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID16928151
OpenAlexW2018023615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.