Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16927255›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2006

Distinct perisynaptic and synaptic localization of NMDA and AMPA receptors on ganglion cells in rat retina.

Jun Zhang, Jeffrey S Diamond

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Spatial Organization and Dynamics of the Extracellular Space in the Mouse Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun ZhangSynaptic Physiology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-3701, USA.
Jeffrey S Diamond
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Synaptic Mechanisms in the Mammalian RetinaZ01NS003039 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI DIAMOND, JEFFREY S · 2007 to 2008
$2.8M
Dynamics Of Excitatory Synaptic Transmission In The HippocampusZ01NS002986 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI DIAMOND, JEFFREY S · 2000 to 2008
$808k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS003039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At most excitatory synapses, AMPA and NMDA receptors (AMPARs and NMDARs) occupy the postsynaptic density (PSD) and contribute to miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) elicited by single transmitter quanta. Juxtaposition of AMPARs and NMDARs may be crucial for certain types of synaptic plasticity, although extrasynaptic NMDARs may also contribute. AMPARs and NMDARs also contribute to evoked EPSCs in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), but mEPSCs are mediated solely by AMPARs. Previous work indicates that an NMDAR component emerges in mEPSCs when glutamate uptake is reduced, suggesting that NMDARs are located near the release site but perhaps not directly beneath in the PSD. Consistent with this idea, NMDARs on RGCs encounter a lower glutamate concentration during synaptic transmission than do AMPARs. To understand better the roles of NMDARs in RGC function, we used immunohistochemical and electron microscopic techniques to determine the precise subsynaptic localization of NMDARs in RGC dendrites. RGC dendrites were labeled retrogradely with cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) injected into the superior colliculus (SC) and identified using postembedding immunogold methods. Colabeling with antibodies directed toward AMPARs and/or NMDARs, we found that nearly all AMPARs are located within the PSD, while most NMDARs are located perisynaptically, 100-300 nm from the PSD. This morphological evidence for exclusively perisynaptic NMDARs localizations suggests a distinct role for NMDARs in RGC function.

Indexed as

AnimalsDendritesImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRetinal Ganglion CellsSynapsesReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID16927255
PMCPMC2577313
OpenAlexW2046571513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.