ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2006
Comparative genomics reveals long, evolutionarily conserved, low-complexity islands in yeast proteins.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regions with two amino acids in protein sequences: A step forward from homorepeats into the low complexity landscape.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Homepeptide repeats: implications for protein structure, function and evolution.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Tandem and cryptic amino acid repeats accumulate in disordered regions of proteins.Genome biology · 2009Article
- Candida albicans Als adhesins have conserved amyloid-forming sequences.Eukaryotic cell · 2008Article
- CandidaDB: a multi-genome database for Candida species and related Saccharomycotina.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Conserved processes and lineage-specific proteins in fungal cell wall evolution.Eukaryotic cell · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic proteomes abound in low-complexity sequences, including tandem repeats and regions with significantly biased amino acid compositions. We assessed the functional importance of compositionally biased sequences in the yeast proteome using an evolutionary analysis of 2838 orthologous open reading frame (ORF) families from three Saccharomyces species (S. cerevisiae, S. bayanus, and S. paradoxus). Sequence conservation was measured by the amino acid sequence variability and by the ratio of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous nucleotide substitutions (K(a)/K(s)) between pairs of orthologous ORFs. A total of 1033 ORF families contained one or more long (at least 45 residues), low-complexity islands as defined by a measure based on the Shannon information index. Low-complexity islands were generally less conserved than ORFs as a whole; on average they were 50% more variable in amino acid sequences and 50% higher in K(a)/K(s) ratios. Fast-evolving low-complexity sequences outnumbered conserved low-complexity sequences by a ratio of 10 to 1. Sequence differences between orthologous ORFs fit well to a selectively neutral Poisson model of sequence divergence. We therefore used the Poisson model to identify conserved low-complexity sequences. ORFs containing the 33 most conserved low-complexity sequences were overrepresented by those encoding nucleic acid binding proteins, cytoskeleton components, and intracellular transporters. While a few conserved low-complexity islands were known functional domains (e.g., DNA/RNA-binding domains), most were uncharacterized. We discuss how comparative genomics of closely related species can be employed further to distinguish functionally important, shorter, low-complexity sequences from the vast majority of such sequences likely maintained by neutral processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.