Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16926762›Full record

ArticleMedGenMed : Medscape general medicine2006

An ethno-medical perspective on research participation: a qualitative pilot study.

José L Calderón, Richard S Baker, Horacio Fabrega, José G Conde, Ron D Hays, Erik Fleming, Keith Norris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. "What's the fun in That?": Latinx Families' Facilitators and Barriers to Virtual Research Participation.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José L CalderónCenter for Cross-Cultural Epidemiologic Studies, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA. drcalderon@sbcglobal.net
Richard S Baker
Horacio Fabrega
José G Conde
Ron D Hays
Erik Fleming
Keith Norris

Funding

SUPPLEMENT FOR RENOVATION OF ANIMAL FACILITIES AT INSTITUTE OF NEUROBIOLOGYG12RR003051 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI FERNANDEZ-REPOLLET, EMMA · 1986 to 2011
$28.1M
YQ MICRODELETIONS AND MALE INFERTILITYP20RR011145 · NCRR · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI FRIEDMAN, THEODORE C · 1995 to 2009
$17.0M
TRAINING COREP20MD000182 · NIMHD · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL A., SHAPIRO, MARTIN F. · 2002 to 2016
$16.5M
RESEARCH INFORMATICS COREG12RR003026 · NCRR · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI BAZARGAN, MOHSEN · 1986 to 2004
$11.5M
VALIDATION OF THE CLINICAL DEMENTIA RATING SCALEP20RR011126 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI KRAISELBURD, EDMUNDO NELSON · 1995 to 2009
$11.2M
CLINICAL TRIALS UNITU01DK054047 · NIDDK · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI DAVIDSON, MAYER BENSON · 1997 to 2003
$5.1M
DREW/UCLA Project Export CenterP20MD000148 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHAPIRO, MARTIN F · 2002 to 2006
$3.6M
Drew Minority Research Infrastructure Support ProgramR24HS014022 · AHRQ · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI BAKER, RICHARD S. · 2004 to 2006
$348k
UCLA/DREW/RAND PROGRAM TO ADDRESS DISPARITIES IN HEALTHP01HS010858 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHAPIRO, MARTIN F · 2000 to 2004
–
AHRQ HHS 1R24-HS014022-01A1AHRQ HHS P01 HS 10858NCRR NIH HHS G12 -RR003026NCRR NIH HHS G12 -RR003026 ANDNCRR NIH HHS G12 RR003051NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR011126NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR011145NIA NIH HHS AG-02-004NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK054047NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000182NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD00148-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment of racial/ethnic minorities for clinical research continues to be problematic, yet critical to ensuring that research data will be applicable to diverse populations. There is a paucity of information about culturally appropriate methods for recruiting and retaining racial/ethnic minorities in research.

objectiveTo cross-culturally assess perceptions of research participation by African American and immigrant Latinos living in the inner-city community of Watts, Los Angeles, California, using qualitative methods.

designFocus groups using ethnically matched moderators were convened with African American and immigrant Latino participants. Discussion was facilitated using a script that focused on perceived "feelings" and "perceptions" about research. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using manual and computerized statistically based software (mixed) methods.

resultsAfrican Americans and immigrant Latinos shared several barriers and motivators to research. However, they also reported barriers and motivators to research that were distinct to each group. Latinos were more interested in healthcare and health information, and African Americans were more concerned with issues of trust and quality of care. Most participants said they would participate in research if they were better informed, or if they or a family member had an illness. Improving communication was reported as being important for motivating participation in clinical research. Overall, socioecologically and socioeconomically based domains were shared, whereas historically and/or socioculturally based domains were distinct.

conclusionsUsing an ethno-medical science model, we demonstrated that it is possible to identify shared barriers and motivators to research participation between 2 distinct cultural groups. This approach can be useful in developing targeted community-based strategies to increase minority participation in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCross-Cultural ComparisonCultural CharacteristicsHispanic or LatinoAdultAgedBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansLos AngelesMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPerceptionPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID16926762
PMCPMC1785211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.