Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16926260›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of sports medicine2006

Reliable change assessment with practice effects in sport concussion research: a comment on Hinton-Bayre.

G H Maassen, E R Bossema, N Brand

Abstract readCommentReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of sports medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Examining the Stability and Predictive Utility of Across- and Within-Domain Intra-Individual Variability in Mild Cognitive Impairment.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Combined Use of Guanfacine andNeurotrauma reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of Different Standard Error Estimates in Reliable Change Methods.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2021
    Article
  10. Validating 1-Year Reliable Change Methods.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2021
    Article
  11. Evidence-based indicators of neuropsychological change in the individual patient: relevant concepts and methods.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G H MaassenDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. g.h.maassen@fss.uu.nl
E R Bossema
N Brand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In his comments on our previous article, Hinton-Bayre advocates the use of the regression based approach in most cases of determining reliable change. This article comments on Hinton-Bayre's argument, discusses cases where the regression method might not be the preferred method, and presents adjustments that make the method more generally preferable.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceBrain ConcussionData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsResearchSports Medicine

Identifiers

PMID16926260
PMCPMC2465072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.