ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2006
A CD40-CD95L fusion protein interferes with CD40L-induced prosurvival signaling and allows membrane CD40L-restricted activation of CD95.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Membrane-bound TNF mediates microtubule-targeting chemotherapeutics-induced cancer cytolysis via juxtacrine inter-cancer-cell death signaling.Cell death and differentiation · 2020Article
- Molecular Mode of Action of TRAIL Receptor Agonists-Common Principles and Their Translational Exploitation.Cancers · 2019Review
- Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment.Cell death and differentiation · 2016Review
- Potent antitumoral activity of TRAIL through generation of tumor-targeted single-chain fusion proteins.Cell death & disease · 2010Article
- The promise of TRAIL--potential and risks of a novel anticancer therapy.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed a novel bifunctional fusion protein, CD40ed-CD95Led, consisting amino-terminally of the extracellular domain of CD40 and carboxy-terminally of the extracellular domain of CD95L. On cells lacking CD40L, this fusion protein is poorly active with respect to CD95 activation [median effective dose (ED50)>1 microg/ml], but it stimulates CD95 signaling with high efficiency upon binding to membrane-expressed CD40L (ED50<1 ng/ml). Thus, cell surface immobilization mediated by the CD40 part of the molecule unmasks the high-latent, CD95-stimulating capacity of the otherwise poorly active CD95L fusion protein. Moreover, interaction of the CD40 part of CD40ed-CD95Led with CD40L prevents the activation of cellular CD40. The CD40ed-CD95Led fusion protein therefore simultaneously blocks antiapoptotic CD40 activation and induces CD95-mediated apoptosis. Indeed, T47D cells displaying an antiapoptotic autocrine CD40-CD40L signaling loop were significantly more sensitive toward CD40ed-CD95Led than toward soluble CD95L artificially activated by crosslinking. Fusion proteins of RANK and CD95L (RANKed-CD95Led) and CD40 and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) (CD40ed-TRAILed), with domain architectures similar to CD40ed-Cd95Led, displayed RANKL-dependent CD95 and CD40L-dependent TRAILR2 activation, respectively, indicating the principle feasibility of this fusion protein design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.