ReviewArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2006
Consent for neonatal research.
Review in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial Characteristics That Affect Parental Consent in Neonatal Drug Trials.American journal of perinatology · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- In vitro cytokine induction by TLR-activating vaccine adjuvants in human blood varies by age and adjuvant.Cytokine · 2016Trial
- Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Questionnaire on Parental Informed Consent in Neonatal Research.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Parental perceptions of informed consent in a study of tracheal intubations in neonatal intensive care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Challenges and successes of recruitment in the "angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in infants with single ventricle trial" of the Pediatric Heart Network.Cardiology in the young · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inherent to all medical research is respect for the rights of the individual. Neonatal research is made more complex by the issue of proxy consent. Obtaining valid informed consent for entry of an infant into a research project needs to deal with this complexity. New evidence on the role and responsibilities of parents in giving consent has implications for all clinical staff that are considering embarking on and/or recruiting infants in research projects. This review explores the issues around informed consent for neonatal research and provides a framework by which consent could be improved. It is to be hoped that such improvements to the process will increase recruitment of infants to research studies while enhancing the validity of the consent process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.