Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16923912›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2006

ScoC and SinR negatively regulate epr by corepression in Bacillus subtilis.

Prashant Kodgire, Madhulika Dixit, K Krishnamurthy Rao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prashant KodgireSchool of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India.
Madhulika Dixit
K Krishnamurthy Rao
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative regulation of epr in Bacillus subtilis 168 is mediated jointly by both ScoC and SinR, which bind to their respective target sites 62 bp apart. Increasing the distance between the two sites abolishes repression, indicating that the two proteins interact, thereby suggesting a mechanism of corepression.

Indexed as

Down-RegulationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesRepressor ProteinsTranscription FactorsBacterial ProteinsFlaD protein, BacteriaPeptide HydrolasesRepressor ProteinsScoC protein, Bacillus subtilisTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16923912
PMCPMC1595376
OpenAlexW1999347203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.