Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16921403›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2006

Regulation of the INK4b-ARF-INK4a tumour suppressor locus: all for one or one for all.

Jesús Gil, Gordon Peters

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 463 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
463citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

463 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 818 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

403 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesús GilMedical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London W12 0NN, UK.
Gordon Peters
The Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120085810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The INK4b-ARF-INK4a locus encodes two members of the INK4 family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p15(INK4b) and p16(INK4a), and a completely unrelated protein, known as ARF. All three products participate in major tumour suppressor networks that are disabled in human cancer and influence key physiological processes such as replicative senescence, apoptosis and stem-cell self-renewal. Transcription from the locus is therefore kept under strict control. Mounting evidence suggests that although the individual genes can respond independently to positive and negative signals in different contexts, the entire locus might be coordinately suppressed by a cis-acting regulatory domain or by the action of Polycomb group repressor complexes.

Indexed as

ADP-Ribosylation FactorsAnimalsApoptosisCellular SenescenceCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Gene Expression RegulationHumansPolycomb-Group ProteinsQuantitative Trait LociRepressor ProteinsSignal TransductionStem CellsADP-Ribosylation FactorsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Polycomb-Group ProteinsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16921403
OpenAlexW2056495027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.