ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2006
Nupafant, a PAF-antagonist prototype for suppression of ventricular fibrillation without liability for QT prolongation?
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contractile function assessment by intraventricular balloon alters the ability of regional ischaemia to evoke ventricular fibrillation.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Article
- Ability to induce atrial fibrillation in the peri-operative period is associated with phosphorylation-dependent inhibition of TWIK protein-related acid-sensitive potassium channel 1 (TASK-1).The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposePAF antagonists inhibit ischaemia-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) in animals. However, unfavourable ancillary actions (on QT interval and coronary flow) have been reported with the PAF antagonist, BN-50739. If these are class actions, they would preclude development of PAF antagonists as novel anti-VF drugs. Our purpose was to examine this proposition using the hitherto untested PAF antagonist, nupafant. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Two rat heart preparations (Langendorff and 'dual coronary' perfusion) were used to assay nupafant's effects on ischaemia-induced VF, coronary flow and QT interval, and to test for the site-selectivity necessary if any effects on VF are caused by PAF antagonism. KEY
resultsGlobal (whole-heart) delivery of 10 microM nupafant, reduced the incidence of ischaemia-induced VF and widened QT interval without affecting coronary flow. Importantly, lower concentrations (0.1 and 1 microM) had no effect on VF, yet widened QT almost identically to 10 microM nupafant. When nupafant was delivered selectively to (and entrapped within) the involved region it partially protected against VF (P<0.05). This occurred without change in QT interval. Selective nupafant delivery to the uninvolved region was without effect. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Nupafant protects against ischaemia-induced VF primarily by site-selective actions in the ischaemic region but, unlike BN-50739, the effect is unrelated to its QT widening action, and is not compromised by any effect on coronary flow. This establishes proof of concept that VF suppression by PAF antagonism need not invariably be associated with QT prolongation or vasodilatation, justifying further development of this drug class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.