ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2007
Prospective study on anti-ganglioside antibodies in childhood Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pyridostigmine Treatment for Pediatric Axonal Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Role of Anti-ganglioside Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome as an Alternate Investigation.Cureus · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntiganglioside antibodies have been reported to play a part in the pathophysiology of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
aimsTo investigate the prevalence and correlation of anti-ganglioside antibodies with clinical data in children with GBS in a multicentre clinical trial.
methodsImmunoglobin (Ig)G and IgM to GM1, GM1b, GD1a, GalNAc-GD1a, GD1b, GT1a, and GQ1b were measured by ELISA in sera obtained before treatment. In addition, serological testing for Campylobacter jejuni was carried out. In parallel, a group of adults with GBS and a control group of children without GBS or other inflammatory diseases were evaluated.
resultsSera from 63 children with GBS, 36 adults with GBS and 41 children without GBS were evaluated. Four of the children with GBS showed positive IgG to GM1, in one case combined with anti-GalNAc-GD1a and in one with anti-GD1b. Two others showed isolated positive IgG to GD1b and GT1a. One showed increased anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgM. In 5 of the 63 children, serological evidence of a recent infection with C jejuni was found, and this correlated significantly with the raised antibodies (p = 0.001). In the control group without GBS, no child showed positive IgG, but one showed anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgM. Compared with the adults with GBS, the frequency of antibodies in children was insignificantly lower. In our study, patients with positive antibodies did not show a more severe GBS course or worse outcome than those who were seronegative, and we could not show an increased incidence of axonal dysfunction.
conclusionsIn some children with GBS, one can detect raised IgG against various gangliosides, similar to that in adults. A recent infection with C jejuni is markedly associated with the presence of these antibodies. However, in contrast with what has been reported in adults, in this study we were unable to show a negative effect of these findings on the clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.