Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16918333›Full record

ReviewCurrent gene therapy2006

Regulatable gene expression systems for gene therapy.

Nuria Vilaboa, Richard Voellmy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gene therapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An adaptable system for improving transposon-based gene expression in vivo via transient transgene repression.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A novel estrogen receptor intramolecular folding-based titratable transgene expression system.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2009
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Image-guided, noninvasive, spatiotemporal control of gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nuria VilaboaUnidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Richard Voellmy
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

Gene therapy for chronic neurodegenerative disordersR01NS044556 · NINDS · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASTRO, MARIA G · 2002 to 2006
$2.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is feasible to restrict transgene expression to a tissue or region in need of therapy by using promoters that respond to focusable physical stimuli. The most extensively investigated promoters of this type are radiation-inducible promoters and heat shock protein gene promoters that can be activated by directed, transient heat. Temporal regulation of transgenes can be achieved by various two- or three-component gene switches that are triggered by an appropriate small molecule inducer. The most commonly considered gene switches that are reviewed herein are based on small molecule-responsive transactivators derived from bacterial tetracycline repressor, insect or mammalian steroid receptors, or mammalian FKBP12/FRAP. A new generation of gene switches combines a heat shock protein gene promoter and a small molecule-responsive gene switch and can provide for both spatial and temporal regulation of transgene activity.

Indexed as

Gene TargetingGenetic TherapyAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID16918333
OpenAlexW2051858097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.