Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16915214›Full record

ReviewMedGenMed : Medscape general medicine2006

Clinical opinion: the biologic and pharmacologic principles for age-adjusted long-term estrogen therapy.

Morris Notelovitz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morris NotelovitzAdult Women's Health & Medicine and International Menopause Society. mnotelo@aol.com
North American Menopause Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiologies of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and breast cancer are briefly reviewed within the context of the relevance and safety of long-term estrogen therapy (ET). Extrapolation of data from the known underlying biology of these diseases and the results of randomized controlled clinical trials suggest that selective ET is appropriate and safe for the majority of postmenopausal women. A key element to this clinical practice is individualization of ET, which includes timing of the initiation of therapy, selection of the route and possibly the type of estrogen prescribed, adjustment of the dose of estrogen over time to compensate for local tissue estrogen synthesis, and annual monitoring and reassessment of the indication for continuing therapy. Established disease requires disease-specific therapy but does not exclude ET cotherapy provided there is an indication for its use. Estrogen-dependent cancer is an absolute contraindication to systemic ET.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16915214
PMCPMC1681943
OpenAlexW2343099452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.