Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16912215›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Isostaticity and controlled force transmission in the cytoskeleton: A model awaiting experimental evidence.

Raphael Blumenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review of cellular mechanotransduction on micropost substrates.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Continuum vs. spring network models of airway-parenchymal interdependence.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2012
    Article
  6. Stress transmission within the cell.Comprehensive Physiology · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Magnetic microposts as an approach to apply forces to living cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Raphael BlumenfeldBiological and Soft Systems, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom. rbb11@phy.cam.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new model is proposed for force transmission through the cytoskeleton (CSK). A general discussion is first presented on the physical principles that underlie the modeling of this phenomenon. Some fundamental problems of conventional models--continuous and discrete--are examined. It is argued that mediation of focused forces is essential for good control over intracellular mechanical signals. The difficulties of conventional continuous models in describing such mediation are traced to a fundamental assumption rather than to their being continuous. Relevant advantages and disadvantages of continuous and discrete modeling are discussed. It is concluded that favoring discrete models is based on two misconceptions, which are clarified. The model proposed here is based on the idea that focused propagation of mechanical stimuli in frameworks over large distances (compared to the mesh size) can only occur when considerable regions of the CSK are isostatic. The concept of isostaticity is explained and a recently developed continuous isostaticity theory is briefly reviewed. The model enjoys several advantages: it leads to good control over force mediation; it explains nonuniform stresses and action at a distance; it is continuous, making it possible to model force propagation over long distances; and it enables prediction of individual force paths. To be isostatic, or nearly so, CSK networks must possess specific structural characteristics, and these are quantified. Finally, several experimental observations are interpreted using the new model and implications are discussed. It is also suggested that this approach may give insight into the dynamics of reorganization of the CSK. Many of the results are amenable to experimental measurements, providing a testing ground for the proposed picture, and generic experiments are suggested.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAnisotropyComputer SimulationCytoskeletonElasticityEvidence-Based MedicineHardnessHumansMechanotransduction, CellularPhysical StimulationPressureStress, MechanicalWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID16912215
PMCPMC1544294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.