ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2006
Occupational noise exposure and ischaemic heart disease mortality.
Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effect of occupational exposure to noise on ischaemic heart disease, stroke and hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-Related Burden of Disease and Injury.Environment international · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Occupational and Environmental Noise Exposure and Extra-Auditory Effects on Humans: A Systematic Literature Review.GeoHealth · 2023Review
- Occupational noise exposure and the prevalence of dyslipidemia in a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- The GoAudio Quantitative Mobile Audiology Test Enhances Access to Clinical Hearing Assessments.American journal of audiology · 2020Article
- Occupational noise exposure and its association with incident hyperglycaemia: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A statistical downscaling approach for generating high spatial resolution health risk maps: a case study of road noise and ischemic heart disease mortality in Melbourne, Australia.International journal of health geographics · 2019Article
- Blood Pressure of Jordanian Workers Chronically Exposed to Noise in Industrial Plants.The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2017Article
- Cardiovascular disease mortality among retired workers chronically exposed to intense occupational noise.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2015Article
- Mass transit ridership and self-reported hearing health in an urban population.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2013Article
- The Magnitude of Mortality from Ischemic Heart Disease Attributed to Occupational Factors in Korea - Attributable Fraction Estimation Using Meta-analysis.Safety and health at work · 2011Article
- Predictive validity of a retrospective measure of noise exposure.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the hypothesis that long term exposure to excessive noise can increase the risk of ischaemic heart disease.
methodsA case-control design, nested within a cohort of nuclear power workers employed at two sites in England over the period 1950-98, was used. Cases were men who died from ischaemic heart disease (ICD-9: 410-414) aged 75 or under; each was matched to a surviving control of the nearest age who joined the same site at the same time. Personal noise exposure was assessed retrospectively for each man by hygienists using (1) company work histories, (2) noise survey records from 1965-98, and (3) judgements about likely use of hearing protection devices. Men were classified into four groups according to their cumulative exposure to noise, with men whose exposure at the company never exceeded 85dB(A) for at least one year being considered "unexposed". Risks were compared via odds ratios (ORs) using conditional logistic regression and adjusted for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, height, BMI, and smoking, as measured at recruitment to the company.
resultsAnalysis was based on 1101 case-control pairs. There was little difference between the exposure groups at recruitment. There was no evidence of increased risk at site A: the ORs for ischaemic heart disease mortality among low, medium, and high exposure categories, compared to unexposed men, being 1.04, 1.00, and 0.77. The corresponding ORs (95% CIs) at site B were 1.15 (0.81-1.65) 1.45 (1.02-2.06), and 1.37 (0.96-1.96). When the comparison was confined to men with at least five years of employment, these dropped to 1.07 (0.64-1.77), 1.33 (0.88-2.01), and 1.21 (0.82-1.79) respectively.
conclusionsThe authors did not find statistically robust evidence of increased risk but the estimates at site B are consistent with those in a major cohort study. A strength of the present study is that the validity of noise estimation at site B has been demonstrated elsewhere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.