ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2006
Predicting preferences: a neglected aspect of shared decision-making.
Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moving toward meaningful shared decision-making in neonatal care: clinical practice and policy implications in Korea.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- Grounded theory qualitative approach from Foucault's ethical perspective: Deconstruction of patient self-determination in the clinical setting.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Review
- Impact of Nurse-Patient Relationship on Quality of Care and Patient Autonomy in Decision-Making.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Accuracy of Predictions of Patients With Breast Cancer of Future Well-being After Immediate Breast Reconstruction.JAMA surgery · 2018Article
- Mind the gap: Physicians' assessment of patients' importance weights in localized prostate cancer.PloS one · 2018Article
- Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department Among Patients With Limited Health Literacy: Beyond Slower and Louder.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016Article
- Ethical signposts for clinical geneticists in secondary variant and incidental finding disclosure discussions.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2015Article
- Ethics of genetic and biomarker test disclosures in neurodegenerative disease prevention trials.Neurology · 2015Review
- The variability of patient preferences.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2012Article
- Shared decision making: trade-offs between narrower and broader conceptions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011Article
- Dying cancer patients talk about physician and patient roles in DNR decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011Article
- Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
- Patients' Preferences for Generic and Branded Over-the-Counter Medicines: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Approach.The patient · 2009Article
- How Consumerist Do People Want to Be? Preferred Role in Decision-Making of Individuals with HIV/AIDS.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2008Article
- To Turn or Not to Turn: Exploring Nurses' Decision-Making Processes Concerning Regular Turning of Nursing Home Residents.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
- How much do patients' preferences contribute to resource use?Health affairs (Project Hope)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, shared decision-making between patients and doctors regarding choice of treatment has become an issue of priority. Although patients' preferences lie at the core of the literature on shared decision-making, there has not been any attempt so far to link the concept of shared decision-making with the extensive behavioural literature on people's self-predictions of their future preferences. The aim of the present review is to provide this link. First, we summarize behavioural research that suggests that people mispredict their future preferences and feelings. Secondly, we provide the main psychological accounts for people's mispredictions. Thirdly, we suggest three main empirical questions for inclusion in a programme aimed at enriching our understanding of shared decision-making and improving the procedures used for putting it into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.