Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16911136›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2006

Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions.

Maria L Jibaja-Weiss, Robert J Volk, Lois C Friedman, Thomas S Granchi, Nancy E Neff, Stephen J Spann, Emily K Robinson, Noriaki Aoki, J Robert Beck

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00473096 (Assessing the Efficacy of a CDSS for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00473096 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Efficacy of a CDSS for Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor College of MedicineRan2000 to 2006Enrolled100ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsInformed breast cancer surgical treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria L Jibaja-WeissDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77098, USA. mariaj@bcm.tmc.edu
Robert J Volk
Lois C Friedman
Thomas S Granchi
Nancy E Neff
Stephen J Spann
Emily K Robinson
Noriaki Aoki
J Robert Beck
Baylor College of Medicine · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USInstitute of Behavioral Sciences · JPThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report on the initial testing of a values clarification exercise utilizing a jewellery box within a computerized patient decision aid (CPtDA) designed to assist women in making a surgical breast cancer treatment decision.

designPre-post design, with patients interviewed after diagnosis, and then after completing the CPtDA sometime later at their preoperative visit. SAMPLE: Fifty-one female patients, who are low literate and naïve computer users, newly diagnosed with early stage breast cancer from two urban public hospitals.

interventionA computerized decision aid that combines entertainment-education (edutainment) with enhanced (factual) content. An interactive jewellery box is featured to assist women in: (1) recording and reflecting over issues of concern with possible treatments, (2) deliberating over surgery decision, and (3) communicating with physician and significant others. OUTCOMES: Patients' use of the jewellery box to store issues during completion of the CPtDA, and perceived clarity of values in making a treatment decision, as measured by a low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).

resultsOver half of the participants utilized the jewellery box to store issues they found concerning about the treatments. On average, users flagged over 13 issues of concern with the treatments. Scores on the DCS Uncertainty and Feeling Unclear about Values subscales were lower after the intervention compared to before the decision was made.

conclusionsA values clarification exercise using an interactive jewellery box may be a promising method for promoting informed treatment decision making by low literacy breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Decision Making, Computer-AssistedEducational StatusAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsHumansMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicTime FactorsWomen

Identifiers

PMID16911136
PMCPMC5060365
OpenAlexW2046352131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.