ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2006
The value of molecular haplotypes in a family-based linkage study.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Homozygosity haplotype allows a genomewide search for the autosomal segments shared among patients.American journal of human genetics · 2007Article
- An efficient method for multi-locus molecular haplotyping.Nucleic acids research · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Novel methods that could improve the power of conventional methods of gene discovery for complex diseases should be investigated. In a simulation study, we aimed to investigate the value of molecular haplotypes in the context of a family-based linkage study. The term "haplotype" (or "haploid genotype") refers to syntenic alleles inherited on a single chromosome, and we use the term "molecular haplotype" to refer to haplotypes that have been determined directly by use of a molecular technique such as long-range allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. In our study, we simulated genotype and phenotype data and then compared the powers of analyzing these data under the assumptions that various levels of information from molecular haplotypes were available. (This information was available because of the simulation procedure.) Several conclusions can be drawn. First, as expected, when genetic homogeneity is expected or when marker data are complete, it is not efficient to generate molecular haplotyping information. However, with levels of heterogeneity and missing data patterns typical of complex diseases, we observed a 23%-77% relative increase in the power to detect linkage in the presence of heterogeneity with heterogeneity LOD scores >3.0 when all individuals are molecularly haplotyped (compared with the power when only standard genotypes are used). Furthermore, our simulations indicate that most of the increase in power can be achieved by molecularly haplotyping a single individual in each family, thereby making molecular haplotyping a valuable strategy for increasing the power of gene mapping studies of complex diseases. Maximization of power, given an existing family set, can be particularly important for late-onset, often-fatal diseases such as cancer, for which informative families are difficult to collect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.