ReviewAnnals of internal medicine2006
Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?
Review in Annals of internal medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 219 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RCT of Financial Incentives to Translate ALLHAT Into Practice
Implementing Tobacco Use Treatment Guidelines in Dental Public Health Clinics
Who cites it
219 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact of Value-Based Payment Models for Networks of Care and Transmural Care: A Systematic Literature Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of Monetary Incentives in Physician Groups: A Systematic Review of Reviews.Applied health economics and health policy · 2020Pooled it
- Pay for performance for hospitals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Pooled it
- Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2017Pooled it
- Payment methods for outpatient care facilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of pay for performance to improve quality of maternal and child care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2016Pooled it
- Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Exploring the influence of trust relationships on motivation in the health sector: a systematic review.Human resources for health · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2012Pooled it
- An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2011Guideline
- Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association.Circulation · 2011Guideline
- Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.BMC health services research · 2010Pooled it
- Pooled it
159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost physicians and hospitals are paid the same regardless of the quality of the health care they provide. This produces no financial incentives and, in some cases, produces disincentives for quality. Increasing numbers of programs link payment to performance. PURPOSE: To systematically review studies assessing the effect of explicit financial incentives for improved performance on measures of health care quality. DATA SOURCES: PubMed search of English-language literature (1 January 1980 to 14 November 2005), and reference lists of retrieved articles. STUDY SELECTION: Empirical studies of the relationship between explicit financial incentives designed to improve health care quality and a quantitative measure of health care quality. DATA EXTRACTION: The authors categorized studies according to the level of the incentive (individual physician, provider group, or health care payment system) and the type of quality measure rewarded. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen of 17 studies examined process-of-care quality measures, most of which were for preventive services. Five of the 6 studies of physician-level financial incentives and 7 of the 9 studies of provider group-level financial incentives found partial or positive effects on measures of quality. One of the 2 studies of incentives at the payment-system level found a positive effect on access to care, and 1 showed evidence of a negative effect on access to care for the sickest patients. In all, 4 studies suggested unintended effects of incentives. The authors found no studies examining the optimal duration of financial incentives for quality or the persistence of their effects after termination. Only 1 study addressed cost-effectiveness. LIMITATIONS: Few empirical studies of explicit financial incentives for quality were available for review.
conclusionsOngoing monitoring of incentive programs is critical to determine the effectiveness of financial incentives and their possible unintended effects on quality of care. Further research is needed to guide implementation of financial incentives and to assess their cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16908917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.