Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16908833›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Selection and analysis of spontaneous reciprocal mitotic cross-overs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Maria A Barbera, Thomas D Petes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. GC content elevates mutation and recombination rates in the yeastProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome Dynamics of HybridG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria A BarberaDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Box 3054, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Thomas D Petes

Funding

RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM024110 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PETES, THOMAS · 1985 to 2015
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM24110NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM024110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a system that allows the selection of the reciprocal products resulting from spontaneous mitotic cross-overs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A number of other types of genetic events, including chromosome loss, can be monitored with this system. For a 120-kb chromosome interval on chromosome V (CEN5-CAN1), the rate of mitotic cross-overs was 4x10(-5) per division, a rate approximately 25,000-fold lower than the meiotic rate of cross-overs. We found no suppression of mitotic cross-overs near the centromere of chromosome V, unlike the suppression observed for meiotic exchanges. The rate of reciprocal cross-overs was substantially (38-fold) elevated by treatment of cells with hydroxyurea, a drug that reduces nucleotide pools and slows DNA replication.

Indexed as

MeiosisSelection, GeneticCentromereChromosome DeletionChromosomes, FungalCrossing Over, GeneticHeterozygoteHydroxyureaPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeHydroxyurea

Identifiers

PMID16908833
PMCPMC1550776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.