Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16905628›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2007

Oral glucose tolerance test is needed for appropriate classification of glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Diabetes and the Heart.

M Bartnik, L Rydén, K Malmberg, J Ohrvik, K Pyörälä, E Standl, R Ferrari, M Simoons, J Soler-Soler, Euro Heart Survey Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. ANMCO/GICR-IACPR/SICI-GISE Consensus Document: the clinical management of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. HbAJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recognition of incident diabetes mellitus during an acute myocardial infarction.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

M BartnikCardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
L Rydén
K Malmberg
J Ohrvik
K Pyörälä
E Standl
R Ferrari
M Simoons
J Soler-Soler
Euro Heart Survey Investigators
Karolinska Institutet · SEErasmus MC · NLFondazione Salvatore Maugeri · ITHebron University · PSKarolinska University Hospital · SEKuopio University Hospital · FIMünchen Klinik Schwabing · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and abnormal glucose regulation (AGR) are at high risk for subsequent cardiovascular events, underlining the importance of accurate glucometabolic assessment in clinical practice.

objectiveTo investigate different methods to identify glucose disturbances among patients with acute and stable coronary heart disease.

methodsConsecutive patients referred to cardiologists were prospectively enrolled at 110 centres in 25 countries (n = 4961). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycaemia 2 h after a 75-g glucose load were requested in patients without known glucose abnormalities (n = 3362). Glucose metabolism was classified according to the World Health Organization and American Diabetes Association (ADA; 1997, 2004) criteria as normal, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or diabetes.

resultsData on FPG and 2-h post-load glycaemia were available for 1867 patients, of whom 870 (47%) had normal glucose regulation, 87 (5%) had IFG, 591 (32%) had IGT and 319 (17%) had diabetes. If classification had been based on the ADA criterion from 1997, the proportion of misclassified (underdiagnosed) patients would have been 39%. The ADA 2004 criterion would have overdiagnosed 8% and underdiagnosed 33% of the patients, resulting in a total misclassification rate of 41%. For ethical concerns and practical reasons, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was not conducted in 1495 of eligible patients. These patients were more often women, had higher age and waist circumference, and were therefore more likely to have AGR than those who were included. A model based on easily available clinical and laboratory variables, including FPG, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, age and the logarithm of glycated haemoglobin A1c, misclassified 44% of the patients, of whom 18% were overdiagnosed and 26% were underdiagnosed.

conclusionAn OGTT is still the most appropriate method for the clinical assessment of glucometabolic status in patients with coronary heart disease.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseBody ConstitutionCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FastingFemaleGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Metabolism DisordersGlucose Tolerance TestHealth SurveysHumansHyperglycemiaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID16905628
PMCPMC1861359
OpenAlexW2122517840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.