Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1690188›Full record

ArticleThe Histochemical journal1990

Post-mortem visualization of peroxisomes in rat and in human liver.

D De Craemer, M Espeel, M Langendries, R B Schutgens, T Hashimoto, F Roels

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Histochemical journal, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A brief history of the human liver peroxisome.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Secondary alterations of human hepatocellular peroxisomes.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 1995
    Review
  6. Liver and chorion cytochemistry.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 1995
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

D De CraemerDepartment of Human Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
M Espeel
M Langendries
R B Schutgens
T Hashimoto
F Roels
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEAcademic Medical Center · NLNagano University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes spontaneous post-mortem changes of peroxisomal staining in normal liver and kidney of rats and in human autopsy liver. At room temperature, regional staining loss is observed at 18 h after death in rat kidney, at 24 h in human liver and at 48 h in rat liver. Preservation at 4 degrees C delays this phenomenon. In human liver, the peroxisomal volume density is decreased at both temperatures at 48 h. After freezing of fresh tissue in dry ice, peroxisomal staining is decreased homogeneously. Under the electron microscope, peroxisomal alterations suggest a loss of catalase activity. These changes do not necessarily preclude the study of peroxisomal features since, even after 48 h at room temperature, peroxisomes are still well stained in the less affected regions. Catalase and three beta-oxidation enzymes, namely acyl-CoA oxidase, bifunctional protein (with enoyl-CoA hydratase and 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase) and 3-oxoacyl-CoA thiolase, could be visualized immunocytochemically in human autopsy livers up to 48 h after death. However, the study of certain peroxisomal features such a catalase activity and peroxisomal distribution, may be hampered as the post-mortem period is prolonged.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansKidneyLiverMaleMicrobodiesMicroscopy, ElectronPostmortem ChangesRatsRats, Inbred StrainsSpecies SpecificityStaining and Labeling

Identifiers

PMID1690188
OpenAlexW2085394550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.