Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16900445›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2006

[Screening of fall risk in frail, but still independently living senior citizens].

Jennifer Anders, Ulrike Dapp, Susann Laub, Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse, Katharina Juhl

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer AndersAlbertinen-Haus Zentrum für Geriatrie und Gerontologie, Wiss. Einrichtung an der Universität Hamburg, Sellhopsweg 18-22, 22459 Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrike Dapp
Susann Laub
Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse
Katharina Juhl
Albertinen Diakoniewerk · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEBehörde für Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobility is one of the most important factors for well-being and autonomy in old age. Impairments in mobility, falls and fear of falling are, therefore, of prognostic value. Falls generally result from an interaction of multiple risk factors. However, older people are often not aware of the risks of falling. They neither recognize risk factors nor report these factors to their physicians. The aim of this study was to develop and to test a self-reported multidimensional screening instrument to evaluate risk factors of falling in community-dwelling older people. Therefore, we identified multiple risk factors of falls based on a systematic literature review and then developed a new questionnaire - the Senior Citizen Risk of Falling Check. Risk factors, i.e. cognitive disorders, that are closely associated with the demand of nursing care were not covered in this relatively healthy target group. We pretested this instrument and adapted it before its use in a pilot test in residents of a sheltered housing complex in Hamburg. A group of 117 residents (average age 82.9 years, range 68.2-98.2 years, 83.8% women), all without care needs (assessed by the German health and care insurance system) returned the Senior Citizen Risk of Falling Check. Within 2 weeks all 117 participants were interviewed by telephone to analyze the test-retest reliability of the instrument (Cohen's kappa). We administered 13 questions on visual and hearing deficits, neurological impairment, depressive mood, medication use, muscle weakness, gait and balance deficits, nutrition, and history of falls. On average, 6 risk factors were reported (range 0-12). Reductions in gait speed (64.1%) was most frequently mentioned. Of the participants, 30.8% fell at least once during the last year and 22.2% of these falls resulted in injuries (fractures, hematomas, laceration, pain). Cohen's kappa was good (2/13 questions) to excellent (10/13 questions) with one exception (balance question kappa=0.20). The study results confirm good test-retest reliability of the fall risk screening Senior Citizen Risk of Falling Check. At the moment we are working on the validation of this questionnaire to provide it to senior citizens throughout Hamburg in cooperation with the City of Hamburg.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentRisk AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleGaitHumansInterviews as TopicMalePilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsResidence CharacteristicsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID16900445
OpenAlexW1516176087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.