ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2006
[Screening of fall risk in frail, but still independently living senior citizens].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of the German falls risk questionnaire, fall risk check (FRC), in community-dwelling seniors : A diagnostic accuracy study.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025Trial
- Validity of the German version of the Stay Independent Questionnaire applied by telephone interview: A diagnostic accuracy study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of an Online Fall-Risk Questionnaire for Nonfrail Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons: A Pilot Study.Current gerontology and geriatrics research · 2016Article
- [Health and competence: detection and decoding using comprehensive assessments in the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS)].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2012Article
- Article
- [Impact of fall risk and fear of falling on mobility of independently living senior citizens transitioning to frailty: screening results concerning fall prevention in the community].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobility is one of the most important factors for well-being and autonomy in old age. Impairments in mobility, falls and fear of falling are, therefore, of prognostic value. Falls generally result from an interaction of multiple risk factors. However, older people are often not aware of the risks of falling. They neither recognize risk factors nor report these factors to their physicians. The aim of this study was to develop and to test a self-reported multidimensional screening instrument to evaluate risk factors of falling in community-dwelling older people. Therefore, we identified multiple risk factors of falls based on a systematic literature review and then developed a new questionnaire - the Senior Citizen Risk of Falling Check. Risk factors, i.e. cognitive disorders, that are closely associated with the demand of nursing care were not covered in this relatively healthy target group. We pretested this instrument and adapted it before its use in a pilot test in residents of a sheltered housing complex in Hamburg. A group of 117 residents (average age 82.9 years, range 68.2-98.2 years, 83.8% women), all without care needs (assessed by the German health and care insurance system) returned the Senior Citizen Risk of Falling Check. Within 2 weeks all 117 participants were interviewed by telephone to analyze the test-retest reliability of the instrument (Cohen's kappa). We administered 13 questions on visual and hearing deficits, neurological impairment, depressive mood, medication use, muscle weakness, gait and balance deficits, nutrition, and history of falls. On average, 6 risk factors were reported (range 0-12). Reductions in gait speed (64.1%) was most frequently mentioned. Of the participants, 30.8% fell at least once during the last year and 22.2% of these falls resulted in injuries (fractures, hematomas, laceration, pain). Cohen's kappa was good (2/13 questions) to excellent (10/13 questions) with one exception (balance question kappa=0.20). The study results confirm good test-retest reliability of the fall risk screening Senior Citizen Risk of Falling Check. At the moment we are working on the validation of this questionnaire to provide it to senior citizens throughout Hamburg in cooperation with the City of Hamburg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.