Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16900358›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2007

Comparative study of topical anti-allergic eye drops on human conjunctiva-derived cells: responses to histamine and IFN gamma and toxicological profiles.

Aude Pauly, Françoise Brignole-Baudouin, Jean-Marc Guenoun, Luisa Riancho, Patrice Rat, Jean-Michel Warnet, Christophe Baudouin

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The use of preservatives in dry eye drops.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019
    Article
  4. Latanoprost in the treatment of glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aude PaulyU598, INSERM, Cordeliers Biomedical Institute, 15 rue de l'école de médecine, 75006, Paris, France.
Françoise Brignole-Baudouin
Jean-Marc Guenoun
Luisa Riancho
Patrice Rat
Jean-Michel Warnet
Christophe Baudouin
Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers · FRInserm · FRCentre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the study was to compare toxic effects and responses to histamine and IFN gamma associated with the use of some widely used anti-allergic eye drops commercially available today.

methodsFor dynamic studies, the Wong-Kilbourne cell line was stimulated for 24 h with histamine or IFN gamma in the presence or absence of anti-allergic eye drops. Supernatants of histamine-stimulated cells were evaluated for the production of IL-6 and IL-8 by ELISA, while the expression of ICAM-1 was evaluated by flow cytometry on IFN gamma-stimulated cells. Toxicological assays were performed using cold light cytofluorometry: viability and apoptosis as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and O2(.)- production were assessed using neutral red, Hoechst/propidium iodide, H(2)-DCFDA and hydroethidine tests, respectively.

resultsAntihistamines reduced IL-6 release and presented dose-dependent inhibitory effects on IL-8 production. None of the eye drops decreased the basal or IFN gamma-stimulated expression of ICAM-1. Conversely, eye drops preserved with benzalkonium chloride (BAC) induced even higher ICAM-1 expression levels on IFN gamma-stimulated cells than did IFN gamma alone, whereas unpreserved drugs had no effect. Toxicological assays confirmed the pivotal role of BAC in proportionally reducing cell viability while increasing apoptosis and oxidative stress.

conclusionsThe ability of topical ocular anti-H(1) drugs to significantly reduce the production of IL-6 and IL-8 argues that they may help treat the inflammatory processes occurring in allergic ocular surface disorders. Nevertheless, preserved ophthalmic formulations may enhance epithelial conjunctival expression of ICAM-1 in the presence of a low inflammatory stimulus, such as IFN gamma, and displayed toxic as well as pro-oxidative effects on these cells. Therefore, BAC used as preservative might in part interfere with the potential anti-inflammatory properties of the active compound by modulating the immuno-inflammatory response of epithelial conjunctival cells.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnti-Allergic AgentsApoptosisCell LineCell SurvivalConjunctivaDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpithelial CellsFlow CytometryHistamineHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Interferon-gammaInterleukin-6Anti-Allergic AgentsHistamineHistamine H1 AntagonistsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Interferon-gammaInterleukin-6Interleukin-8Ophthalmic SolutionsPeroxidesPreservatives, PharmaceuticalReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID16900358
OpenAlexW2027171316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.