Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16900307›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2006

Aspirin resistance - does it clinically matter?

Karsten Schrör, T Hohlfeld, A-A Weber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karsten SchrörInstitut für Pharmakologie und Klinische Pharmakologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstr. 1, Geb. 22.21, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. kschroer@uni-duesseldorf.de
T Hohlfeld
A-A Weber
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variable responsiveness to acetylsalicylic acid(ASA) is a clinical reality that does not principally differ from variable responses to other kinds of drug treatment in other therapeutic fields. Two questions arise: (i) is any resulting "treatment failure"due to a pharmacological failure of the drug to act and (ii) is any reduced antiplatelet activity to ASA related to the clinical outcome oft he patient?Two major laboratory techniques are available to quantify platelet variability to ASA ex vivo: Measurement of platelet function and measurement of thromboxane formation. Both methods have limitations and did not yet result in a generally accepted definition of a pharmacological ASA "resistance".A "true" pharmacological resistance to ASA exists in selected groups of patients. However, unless more information is available,results from in vitro assays of platelet function should not be over-interpreted. More data from prospective trials are required,predominantly by measuring serum thromboxane formation which is a platelet-specific, ASA sensitive reaction. At this time,there is no reason to change there commended daily maintenance dose of about 100 mg ASA without particular requirements in patients who need coronary protection.

Indexed as

AspirinBlood PlateletsDrug ResistanceHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTreatment FailureAspirinPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16900307
OpenAlexW2084646207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.