Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16898850›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2006

Cost effectiveness of adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin therapy in patients not at cholesterol treatment goal in Canada.

Michele Kohli, Cheryl Attard, Annette Lam, Daniel Huse, John Cook, Chantal Bourgault, Evo Alemao, Donald Yin, Michael Marentette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Therapeutic Management of LDL-C: Efficacy and Economic Impact Assessment.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Economic evaluation of ezetimibe combined with simvastatin for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele Kohlii3 Innovus, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Cheryl Attard
Annette Lam
Daniel Huse
John Cook
Chantal Bourgault
Evo Alemao
Donald Yin
Michael Marentette
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USMcGill University · CAMerck Canada Inc. (Canada) · CAUnited States Military Academy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis analysis compared the cost effectiveness of adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin therapy versus atorvastatin titration or adding cholestyramine (a resin) for patients at high risk of a coronary artery disease (CAD) event who did not reach target cholesterol levels on their current atorvastatin dosage. The primary analysis focused on 65-year-old patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of 3.1 or 3.6 mmol/L with a treatment goal of <2.5 mmol/L, classified as very high risk according to the 2000 Canadian Guidelines for Management and Treatment of Hyperlipidaemia.

methodsA previously developed Markov model was utilised to capture the cost and clinical consequences of lipid-lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention of CAD. Comparisons between treatment strategies were made using ICERs (cost per QALY) from a Canadian Ministry of Health perspective. The effects of lipid-lowering therapies were based on clinical trial data. The risks of CAD events were estimated using Framingham Heart Study risk equations. Treatment costs and the costs of acute and long-term care for CAD events were included in the analysis. Costs (Canadian dollar, 2002 values) and outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum.

resultsEzetimibe added to atorvastatin therapy compared with treatment with the most common fixed atorvastatin daily dosage (10 mg) or with common atorvastatin titration strategies (up to 20 mg daily; up to 40 mg daily) resulted in cost per QALY estimates ranging from 25,344 to 44,332 Canadian dollars. The addition of ezetimibe to atorvastatin therapy was less costly and more effective than the addition of cholestyramine (dominant).

conclusionOur analysis suggests that adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin for patients not achieving treatment goals with their current atorvastatin dose produces greater clinical benefits than treatment with a fixed-dose atorvastatin or atorvastatin titration at an increased overall cost. The cost-effectiveness ratios provide strong evidence for the adoption of ezetimibe within the Canadian healthcare system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinAzetidinesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsEzetimibeFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansHypercholesterolemiaMaleAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinAzetidinesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeHeptanoic AcidsPyrroles

Identifiers

PMID16898850
OpenAlexW2083791045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.