Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
Spline functions in convolutional modeling of verapamil bioavailability and bioequivalence. II: study in healthy volunteers.
Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of statistical power function for various diclofenac bioequivalence trials with different subject numbers.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokineticsTrial
- A new approach to the compartmental analysis in pharmacokinetics: fractional time evolution of diclofenac.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of a new verapamil retard tablet formulation have been investigated in a randomized cross-over bioequivalence study on 12 healthy subjects. The drug was given orally at a single new or standard retard tablet dose of 240mg and at a single intravenous dose of 5mg. Plasma verapamil concentrations were determined by HPLC. New retard tablets produced peak plasma verapamil concentrations of 81.34+/-5.69microg/l, time to peak plasma concentrations of 4.91+/-0.89h and an AUC (0-24h) of 1291+/-103.4h x microg/l, with a terminal phase half-life of 55.1+/-14.9h. After intravenous administration verapamil exhibited biphasic elimination kinetics with a terminal plasma half-life of 2.36+/-0.42h and systemic clearance of 34.32+/-5.81 l/h. Bioavailability of the new peroral retard formulation ranged from 19.49+/-4.41% to 67.69+/-11.70%. Absorption rates and amounts were evaluated by means of the spline-convolutional method. Input rates for the new verapamil retard formulation ranged from 0.77+/-0.20mg/h to 5.57+/-1.58mg/h. The cumulative amount of verapamil input was 39.17+/-9.71% for the new retard tablets. All pharmacokinetic parameters for the new verapamil retard tablet formulation, were in reasonable agreement with the data obtained on already registered verapamil retard formulations, indicating their bioequivalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.